Let me begin by saying, I have seen none of these movies. The one I cared about I didn’t get passes to any screenings of, and the other two, well, I hope you understand why I had no desire to see them.
Observe and Report:
This movie looks… odd. If you could take Paul Blart: Mall Cop and then completely turn it in reverse you might get Observe and Report. At least that’s how the previews look. Its one of those films where I laugh at some of the antics in the trailer, but overall I’m not sure I’m going to enjoy the movie as a whole. But, it does have potential. I want to see it, but maybe not for full price.
Dragonball Evolution:
I’ve never been a Dragonball fan, and I doubt I ever will be. I think this movie has the potential to be fun, and it might even do well at the theaters considering there are lots of Dragonball fans out there, but I’ll be waiting for this to be available to watch streaming through Netflix. There is no rush for me to see this at all.
Hannah Montana The Movie:
No.
Fast & Furious:
I have to admit, I liked the first movie in this series. Really liked it. It didn’t make me want to trick out a car and start racing, but I felt it was a well crafted film and worth watching. The second one… not so much. As for Tokyo Drift, well, I’ve never really enjoyed when a series gets to the point where no one from the original is involved. Its like those direct to DVD movies that were filmed to stand alone, but once it became clear that it wasn’t going to the theater the studio decides it will sell better if its “Urban Commando 5: Rough Water” rather than just “Rough Water”.
So the tag line for this film, “New Model, Original Parts”, was just pure genius. Its clearly aimed at people like me. People who wanted to see “The Fast and The Furious 2″ instead of “2 Fast 2 Furious”.
And having said all that, the movie delivers. The only thing the movie fails at is making the timeline clear. Even now, I’m still unsure of exactly how much time has passed since the first film. Other than that, though, Fast & Furious rocks. Its got the fast cars, the hot chicks, the adrenaline pumping races and chases. If you liked any of the previous entries in this series, you’ll like the fourth installment as well.
Adventureland:
Growing up, I knew a few people who’d get those summer jobs working at the local theme park. Being in Atlanta, we have Six Flags and White Water. They loved those jobs… and they hated them too. I never worked one myself, but sometimes wish I had.
Anyway… this movie, in my opinion, suffers from the same problem many many movies do: bad advertising. The commercials for Adventureland emphasize that its “from the Director of Superbad” and it has upbeat music and lots of funny lines, but the reality of the movie is different. Its not anywhere near as crazy or foul as Superbad, and while it is funny at times, its also a story about a guy whose post college plans fall apart and him trying to figure out how to get what he wants, all while falling in love. This movie is less Superbad and more Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist.
That said, I really enjoyed it. As always, managed expectations are important, so if you go with the right attitude I think you’ll like this one, if its something you like. But go in expecting a profanity filled “dick & fart” joke-fest and I think you’ll be disappointed.
I just spent the last couple of months wading through Orcs by Stan Nicholls. On the surface, the conceit of this book is quite inventive: let’s tell a fantasy story from the point of view of orcs. Of course, the moment you delve into the book, the orcs aren’t the orcs of Tolkien or other authors, these orcs are noble warriors who live for battle and only do evil because they are conscripted into the service of a dark sorceress. So, immediately the book is less inventive than originally thought. More so once the featured warband, the Wolverines, go off on their own in defiance of their mistress.
Overall, the book is a decent fantasy tale. Typical, almost, which was a let down when prior to picking it up I was led to believe it was going to break the mold. As the book wore on, and part of the reason it took me so long to slog through it, parts of the prose just feels like filler, as if the author wanted to get to the “cool” part but didn’t want to just jump cut straight to it between chapters and instead wrote a chapter or two to bridge the events. It detracted from the book, for me. I think the same story could have been told with greater effect if it had been half as long, tighter.
I’m not sure I’d recommend this book to others. Perhaps if they were die hard fantasy fans who regularly read mediocre novels they might find this to be excellent. But for me, it was just okay.
Hitting the theaters today are three films: 12 Rounds, The Haunting in Connecticut, and Monsters vs. Aliens.
12 Rounds:
I haven’t seen it yet, but I want to, which means I will likely rent it. It seems like a decent action flick, but I’m just not sure its worth $10 a seat to see it on the big screen. I will have to wait until I read a few reviews.
The Haunting in Connecticut:
Based on a true story. I’m always a tad skeptical when I see that phrase associated with a film, because without a lot of leg work you never know how much is “true story” and how much is “based”. But I like a good scary movie, so when the opportunity arose for me to see this one early, I took it. There are two great things about this movie. The first is that the build up of suspense is very well done. A flash of ghost here, a noise there, with a dab of odd things over there. Its done without getting right in your face, and is fairly creepy. The second great thing is that they manage to tell the story without buckets of blood, tons of gore or any real kind of torture that has accompanied so many horror films over recent years.
I did have some problems with some of the characters in the film, and the sort of matter of fact coincidences that lead to all the right people being in all the right places. The son with cancer just happens to meet a reverend in treatment who happens to know quite a bit about ghosts and hauntings and the psychic world. But as long as I ignored that, it was a decent scary movie.
I’m not sure its worth $10, but its easily worth a matinee price if you enjoy movies about hauntings.
Monsters vs. Aliens:
Oh man. When I saw the trailer for this, I knew I had to see it. The trailer was pure unmitigated awesome. Which is probably why I was a little disappointed with the movie as a whole.
Don’t get me wrong, still a good movie, but I expected it to be better. The main problems I see for this film is that on one level it is clearly aiming for kids, but its got a few slow dramatic scenes and a number of older-skewed “inside jokes” that will sail right over their heads. I’m almost 35, and I got every single inside joke and I thought they were hilarious, but someone ten or fifteen years younger or older might not get them. Small children probably won’t get the Close Encounter or Beverly Hills Cop or a slew of other references. As for the dramatic scenes… well, Pixar has proven that they are kings at giving you drama without stopping the action. Sure, they slow down, but stuff is still going on, even while Mr. Incredible is explaining how he failed. The Dreamworks people are still a bit clunky in this respect. They want to have a serious or heartfelt moment between two characters and the entire movie grinds to a halt so we can see it.
Should you go see it? Even with the problems I mentioned, I would. But definately see it at a theater that is showing it in 3D. You miss half of the awesome without 3D. But even in 3D, if a few overly dramatic halts and inside jokes are going to spoil it for you, then you should pass on this one.
Have you seen Watchmen yet? No? Is the reason that you read some reviews and decided against it based on all the negative things they said?
One thing I have always talked about in my life is managing expectations. Many times when people don’t like a movie or book or some other form of entertainment or experience, the blame can be laid at the fact they went in to it expecting it to be monumental and moving, “the best ever”. With lofty expectations like that, rarely do those movies or books or whatever actually live up to them. So, let’s take a couple paragraphs and talk about how you can review the reviews in order to distill what you need to know before deciding if you want to see Watchmen before you let someone else’s opinion get you to dismiss it out of hand.
If the review you read spent more than half of its words pointing out the flaws of the adaptation from the book to the movie, you might be able to completely ignore them. First, did you read the book? If not, then why do you care where the movie failed to convey the exact same message as the book? You aren’t reading the book, you are going to see the movie. The only thing that matters is if the movie is self consistant and works as a movie. If you did read the book, are you expecting a shot-for-frame transfer of the book from page to screen, or are you looking for an adaptation? Adaptation, by definition, means change. Books are hundreds of pages long. Movie scripts tend to translate as 1 page of script is equal to 1 minute of film. Watchmen, as a comic, is over 400 pages long. And while Watchmen the movie is nearly 3 hours long, 3 hours is only about 180 pages. The movie would need to be around 7 hours long to faithfully translate the book to the screen. So, when you go to see the movie, expect changes. To be honest, it is best to approach Watchmen the movie as being “inspired by” the book. If you love the book so much that you can’t possibly accept any changes made during its translation between mediums, then you probably should avoid the movie.
If the review you read spent a lot of time comparing Watchmen to Iron Man and Spider-man and other comic book films, it shows that the reviewer entered the theater with the wrong expectations. Watchmen is not, and never has been, a story about spandex super heroes saving the day. When Alan Moore wrote the book, his intention was to take all the current super hero elements, put them in a “real world” type scenario and turn them of their ear. Its horribly violent, the characters are spectacularly flawed, the world is a cynical depiction of the worst aspects of humanity. All of those things are what made the story so great and so shocking back when it first appeared. Twenty years have passed, and elements of Moore’s grim and gritty vision of super heroes have rubbed off in all corners of the genre, but his vision is still much more bleak than just about everything that has come since. Spider-man accidentally let his Uncle Ben die, and his life is spent trying to make up for that mistake. Tony Stark built weapons that killed people, and as Iron Man he’s trying to undo the damage he has done. These characters have flaws, but they are nothing compared to the Comedian or Rorschach from Watchmen. Most comic books have characters who are driven by their one (or two or three) flaws to be better people and do good. Watchmen is mostly about people who are a bundle of flaws who are driven by their one (or two or three) redeeming qualities to try to make the world a better place. If you want to see a movie like Spider-man or Iron Man, don’t go see Watchmen. It is just not that kind of film.
Also, the movie is more dramatic than action driven, so if you get bored when people stop fighting and start talking, Watchmen probably isn’t the movie for you. Watchmen is more of a thriller or mystery than an action film, much like the book. The story begins with the death of a former hero, the Comedian, and it follows from there as Rorschach tries to find out why someone would do it. This isn’t the formation of a super hero team riding out to save the world… this is the remains of a dilapidated hero team who have been told we don’t want them to save the world anymore.
It may sound like I’m apologizing for the film. People often mistake my “managing expectations” talk for that. I just hate it when people say that anything categorically and globally failed just because it didn’t meet their personal expectations. When I go to buy things from Amazon, I always read the negative reviews first, because someone pointing out their expectations and the failure of a product to meet those expectations gives me far more information about how I might react to the product than someone gushing about how awesome it is. From reading the negative reviews of Watchmen, I determined that it wasn’t exactly the book, and it wasn’t a typical spandex super hero movie, and those two facts are all I need to frame my expectations before walking into the darkened theater.
In my opinion, and from my point of view, Watchmen the movie perfectly captures the tone and spirit of the book, even if it has to deviate in order to make a watchable running time. It isn’t the best film ever made, but it is far far far from the worst. And in the end, I enjoyed it quit a bit.
What if there was a virus that somehow affected only people who had gone through puberty and killed them, all over the world? That is the stage that is set for the TV show Jeremiah. Don’t bother looking for it in your local listings, it ran on Showtime from 2002 to 2004. The first season ran 20 episodes and the second season ran for 15, and I enjoyed every single one of them.
The major saving grace of this show is that they avoided mutants and monsters, it is just about people. The show begins fifteen years after a virus killed off all the adults, making the oldest people on Earth around thirty years old or so. The world is in disarray. Since kids generally don’t know how to run complex machines everything eventually stopped, and not many kids know how to grow crops so starvation was a big problem. They learned to fend for themselves. And now, fifteen years later, towns run by bullies have solidified and barter cultures have arisen, and some kids have even spent time reading books instead of burning them trying to regain the knowledge they lost in “the Big Death”.
I was worried, of course, as I always am when watching shows that were cancelled that it would end poorly. But Jeremiah managed to tell two seasons worth of stories and even end well. So, if you are a Netflix user and you own an Xbox 360 with a Live Gold subscription, I highly recommend throwing this show into your instant queue and giving it a shot.
  After reading the previous Dresden book, I was eager to see where the story was heading. The events in Dead Beat threw a few curves, and in Proven Guilty some of that gets shaken out. With Harry now a member of the Wardens, he’s got a few new duties, one of which involves being a part of the executions of people who break the laws of magic… laws that Harry himself once broke, and it quite often skirting the edges of.
Of course, that’s not all, as new baddies breeze in to town and set upon the people attending Splattercon!!!, a horror movie convension being held is Dresden’s beloved Chicago.
Yeah, I like this one as much as I have like the others. Jim Butcher is yet again able to keep me turning the pages, and turning them quickly as I blow through the eighth book in this series. The only thing I worry about now is running out of Dresden books to read and having to wait for Mr. Butcher to complete the next one to get my fix.
Rounding out David Wellington’s vampire trilogy is Vampire Zero. Unlike his zombie books which were uneven (the three of them were, in order, great, alright and good), the vampire series has been far more consistent.
This time around, our intrepid trooper Laura Caxton is on her own… sort of. With the events of 99 Coffins behind her, she is now living in the aftermath. She’s been given her own department within the State Troopers to continue the hunting of the remaining vampires. She has learned well and knows how to hunt vampires, but these vampires know her as well and they’ll try to outthink her, something vampires aren’t supposed to do.
The body counts here aren’t small, but they are nothing like the last book. While Caxton tries to tie up her loose ends, Arkeley is trying to tie up loose ends of his own, and its a race to see who gets there first.
I really enjoyed the book, just as much as the previous two, and who knows… there might be a fourth given the way things end. I know I wouldn’t mind.
Another Dresden book, and another good read. This time the wizard takes on necromancers in Dead Beat.
I could go on gushing about the book, but if you read my blog you know that I love them. I will admit that I enjoyed Jim Butcher’s take on necromancy and raising the dead. It was new to me, the concept of having a “drummer” who keeps the beat that allows the dead to stay under the control of the necromancer. Very interesting.
Anyway, I do look forward to reading the next book given all the events of this one… 
In time for the Halloween season, I picked up a collection of zombie short stories called The Living Dead.
One thing I have learned over the years running into zombie fans on the internet and out in the world is that everyone has their favorites. Some like the slow Romero zombies (my personal favorite), others like the fast running Dawn of the Dead remake style, while still others prefer the hoodoo voodoo zombies, and there are many more flavors. This collection of short stories pretty much covers them all. From the cursed living who return from the dead to the mindless drones and even to actors playing extras in Romero’s original Dawn of the Dead at the mall.
Because of this wide range of coverage, I can’t say I loved every story. In fact, I’d probably say I only loved maybe a third of them, possibly less. Some of them I could barely trudge my way through, so alien were the concepts of zombies envisioned by their authors (hence the reason why it took me well over a month to read the whole thing). But, it did make me realize how wide the idea of “zombies” can run, and that perhaps the ideas I’ve been nurturing are not as common as I thought they were.
When I closed the cover of this tome, I was relieved to finally be done what, in part at least, had been a chore to get through. But I was also satisfied, and really, what more can you ask of a book than that?
|
Projects Business Application
percent: 15 / 100 (15%)
Untitled Web Game
percent: 25 / 100 (25%)
|
Recent Comments